• +31647181190
  • info@dekna.org
  • Netherlands

advantages and disadvantages of matriarchy

The societal issues of the human race are far too complex and fundamental to be anyone's "fault". It is true some human men do help with caring for the young but many will also leave the female when she is pregnant or has his child and will strongly resist paying maintenance for his own children. This is why I wan't women to rule instead. In the case of Countess Bathory, all of the men who obeyed her orders were executed, and she was given house arrest. The animals reproduce by mating and reproducing a new generation. If our ancestors had been pacifists, we would not be here today. Go back to school. I would agree that it would be a great idea to teach men to loving and caring human beings. He claims this means that men will always outnumber women in most positions of power in our world. Steve Andrews from Lisbon, Portugal on July 05, 2012: Lucy, who is it that invents and builds and uses weapons of mass destruction? If you want to live in a society where women rule, the Mosuo are there waiting for you in China, in their villages with no electricity or running water, and where livestock roam through the houses. But as i have also pointed out the it the type of people in power that is far more important than the system they use. Wow. What IS an obvious difference is that matriarchal societies had women making the decisions. I'm sure you can find a way to blame that lack of maternal instinct on men, though. "I cannot understand you thinking my articles are full of hate!? In many cultures, and particularly indigenous societies, the . ". In the whole of recorded history it has been men who have ruled our world, and as history has shown us so many times, men do a terrible job in doing this. However, women are more risk-averse than men are. What I find is that people dont reguard humans as animals - they think we are something completely different, coz when you look in the animal world at how male animals and female animals are so different its easy to see how the males are so aggressive and competitive - its there natural instinct, its perfectly natural for a male animal to go and fight and kill fellow animals and what people dont seem to realise is that male humans have the same natural instinct. By Silvia Azaa Gutirrez B.Sc., M.Sc. It is very true what you say about the differences in the sexes - how males are naturally more aggressive - im not saying all males but in general males are. However that all depends how you define Matriarchy doesn't it, among us Native American Indians a Matriarchy is a society that lives in harmony with Mother Nature; with the Earth, with animals, with each other, and with the cosmos. In simple words, this system is for the mothers of a family. As women have far less interest in war and violence than what men do. If I fine you, it will economically disadvantage the children. You are no better than the most radical feminist, and no better than the most traditional neo-con. You then have to ask yourself why are we allowing idiots like this rule and dominate our world? There are many definitions available for elaborating the concept of patriarchy. We are far more likely to have caring people rule our world, if we have women only matriarchal political parties, who get into power. -. In the animal world it is very rare to see female animals fight each other unless they are a carnivorous animal. What about the Native peoples of the Amazon Rainforest who know a great deal more about the rainforest then you or I ever could? Women still have a hard time if they want to be a scientist or engineer. Why don't you go to the patent office and check what percentage of patents have been registered to women since 1982 (the year women achieved parity in post-secondary education)? It is always men that are the most violent criminals, which is why prisons are full of men. As for war and genocide, very few women get involved in this. Just education but more of it and most importantly, available to more people. Economic advantage. A number of characteristics that distinguish women leaders from men when it comes to qualities of leadership: Women leaders are more assertive and persuasive, have a stronger need to get things done and are more willing to take risks than male leaders.Women leaders were also found to be more empathetic and flexible, as well as stronger in interpersonal skills than their male counterparts.enabling them to read situations accurately and take information in from all sides.These women leaders are able to bring others around to their point of view.because they genuinely understand and care about where others are coming from.so that the people they are leading feel more understood, supported and valued. Any rational woman would seek to avoid that sort of outcome yet regardless, women have always taken the brunt of brutality from men and the culturally patriarchal encouragement of their own disposability, indeed women supported it, but they damn well didn't create it, hierarchal culture as well as firmly constructed gender roles have been defended by patriarchal men for centuries, any woman who dared to question suffered extreme consequences. Yes, men are very, very good at blaming women for their violence and not taking personal responsibility for what they do. If we look at female politicians today, they are given a hard time if they want to get into any position of power The fact is that when men rule our world, we have a world of violence, war and injustice. So you added that, well things have gotten so messed up it's time we tried something else. All the matriarchal societies of the Neolithic age was destroyed by violent conquest. "Certainly no man would do this. So those 99% are, if anything, an indication that men are in a lot of trouble. This disadvantage has even occurred in the modern era. You, a man, decides that men are naturally not suited to be in decision making positions. So why would women do a far better job in ruling our world than men? To keep on repeating what I have previously said. Advantages And Disadvantages Of Feminism. Men do a terrible job in ruling our world. It can only be done through democractic means. But this shouldn't be a problem because the only way a matrairchal government can get into power is through demcratic means. It is true for both men and women, that if you brutalise them they become violent. In a monarchy, both would be expected. ". As for the rest, I agree that this is starting to go around in circles but that is because you ignored my points and just responded by repeating your initial statements. ( noun) When a married couple live together in a new residence instead of with the husband's family ( patrilocal residence) or the wife's family ( matrilocal residence ). I'm saying it may not be because of the genitalia of the rulers. Patriarchy also means giving power and dominance to men over women. If poverty can be elimination, then crime for both black and white men will be greatly reduced. Women have had equal access to education for the last half century. They talk and act as if women's maternal instinct is something they need to overcome, if they want to compete against men. And when she shared in the spoils he'd taken, it had nothing to do with her. The authority and descendants lie on one of the two genders. Everyone is accountable for their deeds, no one is ever excused from them perhaps they are legally dismissed unfortunately, but in the end everyone will be forced to face the evil of their deeds, NDE's are proof of that fact. 121. It is, in fact, driven in large part by women, because women drive 80% of consumer spending. ". They certainly make perfect sense within an evolutionary perspective. I know patriarchal men like to blame women, but you cannot escape the fact that all governments of our world are dominated by men and masculine values. I would like to take this chance to say thankyou for writing about this subject its such ashame that it is not more widely discussed. Precisely! Things can only change when we have matriarchal political parties where women are free to be themselves and not have men tell them how to behave. You cannot blame women for wars, because women do not rule our world. I mean, don't you have better things to do with your life in first place or are you completely out of work? And in our competitive patriarchal world is seems that the most competitive and aggressive people get to the top.. They are just as ruthless and corrupt. The only political system that has noticeably improved the lives of the people has been democracy, even though wars and inequality are still commonplace in democratic countries. It should be so, so clear that if one sex, (men) have been ruling our world and is doing a really terrible job in ruling our world. I can assure you that I don't have many resources and those in which I do are limited, I am without a job, and I alone am my only damn motivator and encourager, nothing has ever been given to me! Any of these 'males' with fandom fantasies are simply 'beta', weak men who are not attractive and will not pass on their genes. But the same mentality still there, men do not fight for power with swords but with words. The authority belongs to a male head followed by the distant members of the same family tree. Its really interesting abd informative reading all the comments about this, what i didn't realise is about the percentages of crime - yes i knew men cause more crime than females but never realised its about 99% - that is alot and really needs to be addressed! Then only on paper would women rule the world and only as long as men, the actual ones in power, allow it. Even if a political matriarchy was achievable in a democracy (which I don't think it is), it would depend on the entire rest of the world being peaceful to survive. Men seem to be incapable of changing this, even though many men have tried. I will not reply to any of your comments, you do not deserve it. In most mammal species the males have nothing, or very little to do with this. As for me generalizing. Nowadays in the Western world things have changed and we now have democracy. The saying goes "the mother makes the man". The oligopoly market will have less competition, but the behavior of the firms can even be highly competitive. In the whole history of warfare only a small handful of women have joined in this insanity. It would also depend on somehow mitigating the social problems that arise when matriarchy extends to the base unit of society--the 2-32 times greater risk fatherless children have of a whole host of social maladies that lead them to be burdens on, rather than productive members of, society. As mentioned, this system is the descendant of female governance. The difference between the nuclear family and the extended family is that a nuclear family refers to a single basic family unit of parents and their children, whereas the extended family refers to their relatives, as well - such as grandparents, in-laws, aunts and uncles, etc. Few women get involved in this insanity because they have a maternal instinct. One judge in Florida estimated that 80% of temporary restraining orders handed to women during divorce and custody cases were either completely unfounded, or maliciously false. The reason why men have been able to do this, is that they are far more competitive and aggressive than women. Related: Superwomen breaking the myths and handed-down opinions. To rise to power within a female only political system would require being just as competitive and ruthless as in anywhere else. You can safely say that over 99% of all violence committed in our world has been committed by men. Yes, violent men always make this excuse. Feminism is both an intellectual commitment and a political movement . But if men have exclude women from any position of power for thousands of years, what makes you think men are suddenly going to change? Enjoy your matriarchy. "As for hating their own sex, men already do this. The real scary part is that I think you genuinely believe that you want to make things better. All political rulers do this - women included. Hi PsyChuan, Yes, there are peaceful men but they don't seem to have a much power or influence, in the patriarchal world we live in. Price Stability Due To Competitiveness. Advertisement. Society is quite conservative. Women are the Carers and nurturers of our world. But women are likewise motivated by their maternal instinct. William Bond (author) from England on July 15, 2012: Hi Girlwriteswhat, I agree with you that patriarchy was created when patriarchal tribes conquered the peaceful matriarchal Neolithic civilizations. Sure you could make a list of differences too but that could never be even remotely as long. This greater interests has been demonstrated by Dr. Simon Baron Cohen to begin as early as the neo-nate stage: newborn boys stare longer at mechanical objects, and newborn girls stare longer at faces. I think this discussion is done. Thus, those resources should be sustainable and can be recycled. If women were as violent and aggressive as men we would have in our history great Amazon armies setting out to conquer the world. One thing I might not have mentioned yet is that it is also nearly always men who stop those atrocities. In a broader sense it can also extend to moral authority, social privilege and control of property. Whoever No Name is has to get off of his high horse and realize that he is no better at being a leader than women. Matriarchal societies are consciously built upon these maternal values and motherly work, and this is why they are much more realistic than patriarchies. Certainly no man would do this. Matriarchy is essentially a woman-oriented society, wherein all the leadership and authority rest in the hands of women. You have fewer financial burdens with a correctly structured partnership. I've found another mistake in your reasoning though: You make a correlation where there might not be one and sell it as fact. As long as you don't see what's wrong with that, then there's not point in discussing it. There has been found evidence that contridict all of these firmly held beliefs, that women of those times not only brought forth children but also hunted both small and big game, and were also gatherers and inventors, that sculpted figurines and did cave paintings. Why would I? Among animal species, the only female kin of a given offspring who will actually die to protect that offspring is a post-reproductive age grandmother. Men have a competitive instinct and women have a maternal instinct and these instincts make a big difference in the way men and women behave. Also hunter-gatherer socities naturally tend to have non-hierarchal egalitarian social structures, there is social and economic equality and violence often tends to be very rare which in spite of their lack of technology seems to be more highly advanced society morally than the one we currently live in. Their precepts aim to meet everyone's needs with the greatest benefit. As you have pointed out patriarchal politicans only pretend to be caring people. Anyone who aspires for such a position has to be extremely competitive in order to succeed and this is every bit as true for women as it is for men. Because women enact their competitiveness and violence in an indirect way, where they do not face the risks involved in enacting one's own violence and competition, there is a moral hazard in putting women in charge of how and when said violence is dispensed. Key disadvantages include the high costs of ERP software, its complexity, slow implementation, and data migration. Yes, i am a man, and as a man I am ashamed of my sex for the irrisponsible way we rule our world. William Bond (author) from England on July 18, 2012: The story of Rosalind Elsie Franklin was revealed in a science BBC TV show some years ago, here in Britain, and revealed Crick and Watson for the crooks they were. Your position is that the other sex definitely will do a better job. In most of history we have been ruled by chiefs, warlords, kings, emperors and dictators. The two systems have a major difference in their ideas about nature. To counter arguments like this, women stated that men and women are the same, and continued to say this in 1960 -70s with the Womens Liberation Movement. Mothers commit higher rates of physical abuse than fathers. But if you try to make any such claims about other peoples worth and capability people you have never met that is when you're out of you're causing trouble. showtime boxing ring announcers; Toggle Navigation matriarchy: [noun] a family, group, or state governed by a matriarch. The biggest and strongest stag gets to mate with most of the females and those who are not strong enough, never get the chance to mate. Every society incorporates some basic components in its system of reckoning kinship: family, marriage, postmarital residence, rules that prohibit sexual relations (and therefore . Multiculturalism can also be beneficial for companies. Some advantages of a nuclear family are financial stability, strong support systems for children, and providing consistency in raising children. There are far more male killers than female killers. Men who are violent beasts, constitute a tiny minority of the male population. It is dustproof and waterproof and can be recycled. There are other cases like this, where male scientists have stolen the work of female scientists. Also mentally it makes the average man far more aggressive than the average woman. But where we disagree is how you achieve this. I amwell, I'd be insulted if I wasn't so used to it. It is likely that their higher levels of the male aggression hormone "testosterone" is the cause - the same instincts that make them excell in sports makes them excell in crime. Ok, I'm starting to get irritated by your repeated misquoting of my words.

Eric Whitacre Wife, What Is Primo Schwartzie Dressing, Leeds Hostel Homeless, Polly Noonan Bio, Phil Anderson Woodturner, Sean Lee Yun Feng First Wife, Jack Walker Granddaughter,

advantages and disadvantages of matriarchy